Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16561 - 16570 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16561 - 16570 of 30081 for de.
State v. Kendell G.
presents a question of statutory interpretation, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Michels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3332 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of statutory interpretation, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Michels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3332 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. State v. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, ¶12, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35777 - 2009-03-10
, which we review de novo. State v. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, ¶12, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35777 - 2009-03-10
[PDF]
City of Mequon v. Sarah J. Peacock
review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary detention of a citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5348 - 2017-09-19
review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary detention of a citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5348 - 2017-09-19
State v. Anthony T. Jones
the constitutional test of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Ferguson, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24927 - 2006-04-26
the constitutional test of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Ferguson, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24927 - 2006-04-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
an issue of law we review de novo. Ellingsworth v. Swiggum, 195 Wis. 2d 142, 147, 536 N.W.2d 112 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35483 - 2014-09-15
an issue of law we review de novo. Ellingsworth v. Swiggum, 195 Wis. 2d 142, 147, 536 N.W.2d 112 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35483 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Chad A. Hansen
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15348 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15348 - 2017-09-21
State v. James P. Sullivan
to permit the test.” Section 343.305(9)(a)5, Stats. [5] Although our review in this case requires a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
to permit the test.” Section 343.305(9)(a)5, Stats. [5] Although our review in this case requires a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Herrmann, 364 Wis. 2d 336, ¶23. Jeffery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Herrmann, 364 Wis. 2d 336, ¶23. Jeffery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
Alicia Danielson v. Andrea H. Gasper
contract is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Hull v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2474 - 2005-03-31
contract is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Hull v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2474 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Hicks
The constitutionality of a statute is reviewed de novo. State v. McManus, 152 Wis.2d 113, 129, 447 N.W.2d 654, 660
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8137 - 2017-09-19
The constitutionality of a statute is reviewed de novo. State v. McManus, 152 Wis.2d 113, 129, 447 N.W.2d 654, 660
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8137 - 2017-09-19