Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16561 - 16570 of 29722 for des.
Search results 16561 - 16570 of 29722 for des.
State v. Christopher L. Nagel
for Outagamie County: John a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. HOOVER, J. Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13302 - 2005-03-31
for Outagamie County: John a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. HOOVER, J. Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13302 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54241 - 2010-09-08
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54241 - 2010-09-08
State v. Jimmy Lee Hensley
of a reason to doubt competency is a constitutional fact, reviewed de novo. Id. at 265, 407 N.W.2d at 312
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9812 - 2005-03-31
of a reason to doubt competency is a constitutional fact, reviewed de novo. Id. at 265, 407 N.W.2d at 312
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9812 - 2005-03-31
Lloyd M. Morey Trust v. Robert Morey
of law that we review de novo.” Brown, 165 Wis. 2d at 65, 477 N.W.2d at 302. The Trust claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15590 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo.” Brown, 165 Wis. 2d at 65, 477 N.W.2d at 302. The Trust claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15590 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, parsed out individually, were de minimis. True, some of the discrepancies seem trivial: Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56618 - 2010-11-16
, parsed out individually, were de minimis. True, some of the discrepancies seem trivial: Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56618 - 2010-11-16
State v. Todd R. Gilbertson
” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10481 - 2005-03-31
” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John T. Werner
of law we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3297 - 2017-09-19
of law we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3297 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James M. Povolny v. James B. Totzke
). However, whether these facts fulfill the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5883 - 2017-09-19
). However, whether these facts fulfill the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5883 - 2017-09-19
State v. Terry T.
. 938 procedures. The proper construction of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4317 - 2005-03-31
. 938 procedures. The proper construction of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4317 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dann P. Knippel
facts to the constitutional requirement of consent is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31
facts to the constitutional requirement of consent is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31