Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16591 - 16600 of 33520 for ii.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, with the circuit court concluding that the surcharge was mandatory. II. DISCUSSION A. The single mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163180 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Nate Wilson
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12529 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael G.
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II IN THE INTEREST OF MICHAEL G., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12566 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Petitioners' Memorandum of Law
. ...................................................................................... 17 II. Wisconsin’s legislative maps are extreme partisan gerrymanders and violate the Wisconsin
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_petitioneresmemo.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] Microsoft Word - Mitchell First Brief CORRECTED
THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES AT THE TIME OF ARREST. 21 -ii- THE RESULTS OF MITCHELL’S
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/mitchell.pdf - 2018-04-04

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Petitioners re: Proposed Maps
. ................................................................... 6 II. The Clarke maps best comply with the mandatory constitutional criteria
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224resbriefpetitio.pdf - 2024-01-23

[PDF] Synopsis of cases being heard in oral argument, January 2020
. This is a review of a decision of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II (headquartered in Waukesha
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsjan2020.pdf - 2020-01-10

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Democratic Senator Respondents' Response to Motion to Recuse
of the Petition. ........................................................................... 14 II. Due Process
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822demsenresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Intervenors-Respondents Johnson et al. re: Proposed Maps
........................................................................................................ 4 I. There Is No Good Reason Not to Adopt the Simple Remedy. ................. 4 II. The Johnson
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224responsebriefintervenors.pdf - 2024-01-22

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2018
of Appeals: District II Circuit Court: Sheboygan County, Judge Terence T. Bourke Long caption: State
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210764 - 2018-04-03