Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16591 - 16600 of 43166 for t o.

State v. Frank Miles
, contrary to §§ 161.14(4)(t), 161.01(14), 161.41(3r) and 161.48(2), Stats., 1993‑94. The issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12468 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court’s judgment dictated the terms of any sale of the property, stating, in pertinent part: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100036 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 4, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246181 - 2019-09-04

COURT OF APPEALS
supervision) and specifically stated on the record that “[t]here are no statutory aggravating factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30297 - 2007-09-17

COURT OF APPEALS
, v. Landris T. Jines, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33898 - 2008-09-02

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 28, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. The amended answer denied the existence of a partnership and stated that “[t]he entity known as Denny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28524 - 2007-03-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 7, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529233 - 2022-06-20

State v. Stanley A. Newago
be placed on the record. The district attorney stated the agreement as follows: [I]t’s my understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3205 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 1, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383016 - 2021-07-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Spiess’s case “is by far the wors[t] pedophilia and molestation case she has seen in her career
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161769 - 2017-09-21