Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 8730 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 120 Cm Toili Banggai.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 8730 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 120 Cm Toili Banggai.
State v. Mohammed A. Nonahal
120 days.[2] The 120-day limit was to expire on February 8, and Brown’s attorney requested a February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2339 - 2005-03-31
120 days.[2] The 120-day limit was to expire on February 8, and Brown’s attorney requested a February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2339 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the condition that she serve 120 days in the House of Corrections. The circuit court awarded Haley the four
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362377 - 2021-05-04
with the condition that she serve 120 days in the House of Corrections. The circuit court awarded Haley the four
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362377 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to trial within 120 days, by July 17, 2009. ¶2 At an April 20, 2009, status conference, defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237855 - 2019-03-21
to trial within 120 days, by July 17, 2009. ¶2 At an April 20, 2009, status conference, defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237855 - 2019-03-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 120, 921 N.W.2d 730. ¶10 We review a restitution order under the erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718650 - 2023-10-24
Wis. 2d 120, 921 N.W.2d 730. ¶10 We review a restitution order under the erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718650 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Roland A. Smart
for Smart’s offense to 120 days in jail. This had also been the recommended penalty before January 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
for Smart’s offense to 120 days in jail. This had also been the recommended penalty before January 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
of §§ 939.05 and 161.41(1)(cm)2, Stats., and possession of a schedule II controlled substance as a dealer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10656 - 2005-03-31
of §§ 939.05 and 161.41(1)(cm)2, Stats., and possession of a schedule II controlled substance as a dealer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
, possession of more than 100 grams of cocaine with intent to deliver it, in violation of § 161.41(1m)(cm)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21
, possession of more than 100 grams of cocaine with intent to deliver it, in violation of § 161.41(1m)(cm)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Luis E. Bermudez
2 deliver cocaine contrary to § 161.41(1)(cm)3, STATS., 1993-94. 1 On appeal, Bermudez renews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12241 - 2014-09-15
2 deliver cocaine contrary to § 161.41(1)(cm)3, STATS., 1993-94. 1 On appeal, Bermudez renews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12241 - 2014-09-15
State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
with intent to deliver it, in violation of § 161.41(1m)(cm)5, Stats., 1993-94, which carried an enhanced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12485 - 2005-03-31
with intent to deliver it, in violation of § 161.41(1m)(cm)5, Stats., 1993-94, which carried an enhanced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
of conviction for party to the crime of delivery of cocaine in violation of §§ 939.05 and 161.41(1)(cm)2, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10656 - 2017-09-20
of conviction for party to the crime of delivery of cocaine in violation of §§ 939.05 and 161.41(1)(cm)2, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10656 - 2017-09-20