Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 63587 for child support.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 63587 for child support.
CA Blank Order
Stephens appeals an order deciding a motion to modify child support that was filed by respondent Marcus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131172 - 2014-11-30
Stephens appeals an order deciding a motion to modify child support that was filed by respondent Marcus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131172 - 2014-11-30
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Dawn C.
witness testimony in support of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7655 - 2005-03-31
witness testimony in support of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7655 - 2005-03-31
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Dawn C.
witness testimony in support of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7656 - 2005-03-31
witness testimony in support of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7656 - 2005-03-31
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Dawn C.
witness testimony in support of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7657 - 2005-03-31
witness testimony in support of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7657 - 2005-03-31
Jeannine M.C. v. Michael A.C.
IN THE INTEREST OF BABY BOY C., A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 18: JEANNINE M. C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9979 - 2005-03-31
IN THE INTEREST OF BABY BOY C., A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 18: JEANNINE M. C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was insufficient to support her convictions for possession of child pornography. Specifically, she contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923254 - 2025-03-06
was insufficient to support her convictions for possession of child pornography. Specifically, she contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923254 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; “reasons why a parent was not caring for or supporting [his or] her child[;] and exposure of the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913233 - 2025-02-07
; “reasons why a parent was not caring for or supporting [his or] her child[;] and exposure of the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913233 - 2025-02-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
in contempt of a child support order and ordering 120 days in jail, stayed, with payment of support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30124 - 2014-09-15
in contempt of a child support order and ordering 120 days in jail, stayed, with payment of support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30124 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the other party. 11. Whether each party can support the other party’s relationship with the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87863 - 2014-09-15
with the other party. 11. Whether each party can support the other party’s relationship with the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87863 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
party can support the other party’s relationship with the child, including encouraging and facilitating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87863 - 2011-03-14
party can support the other party’s relationship with the child, including encouraging and facilitating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87863 - 2011-03-14