Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 68273 for did.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 68273 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the statute involved was unconstitutional; because the trial court did not err in denying the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33865 - 2008-09-02
that the statute involved was unconstitutional; because the trial court did not err in denying the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33865 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
, but it did not state its reasons for exercising its discretion to deny an evidentiary hearing. However, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57825 - 2010-12-13
, but it did not state its reasons for exercising its discretion to deny an evidentiary hearing. However, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57825 - 2010-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; (2) the missing evidence could be obtained from other sources; and (3) the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662295 - 2023-06-02
; (2) the missing evidence could be obtained from other sources; and (3) the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662295 - 2023-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the circuit court erred by determining that his trial counsel did not render ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786768 - 2024-04-09
argues that the circuit court erred by determining that his trial counsel did not render ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786768 - 2024-04-09
State v. Christopher Anson
of the inadmissible statements did not impel Anson to take the stand. We agree and conclude that Anson is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6537 - 2005-03-31
of the inadmissible statements did not impel Anson to take the stand. We agree and conclude that Anson is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6537 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the examiner did not recommend conditional release, and only then withdrew his petition. The court further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749252 - 2024-01-09
that the examiner did not recommend conditional release, and only then withdrew his petition. The court further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749252 - 2024-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Anson
of the inadmissible statements did not impel Anson to take the stand. We agree and conclude that Anson is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6537 - 2017-09-19
of the inadmissible statements did not impel Anson to take the stand. We agree and conclude that Anson is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6537 - 2017-09-19
State v. James D. Ryan
to dismiss the refusal order after he pleaded guilty to the OWI charge. We conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7661 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss the refusal order after he pleaded guilty to the OWI charge. We conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Ferry
) the initial search was invalid because the police did not have reasonable grounds for detaining Ferry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19
) the initial search was invalid because the police did not have reasonable grounds for detaining Ferry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James D. Ryan
conclude the circuit court did not err on any of these points and we therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7661 - 2017-09-19
conclude the circuit court did not err on any of these points and we therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7661 - 2017-09-19