Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 64780 for records.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 64780 for records.
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103604 - 2013-10-29
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103604 - 2013-10-29
State v. Steven T. Miller
. Miller has responded to the report. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
. Miller has responded to the report. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven T. Miller
. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
bank records into evidence; that the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) failed to meet its burden
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252902 - 2020-01-28
bank records into evidence; that the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) failed to meet its burden
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252902 - 2020-01-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for dismissal. Based upon our review of the brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632888 - 2023-03-14
for dismissal. Based upon our review of the brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632888 - 2023-03-14
State v. Randy J. Krueger
that the instant offense was the third offense by introducing a certified copy of his driving record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11489 - 2005-03-31
that the instant offense was the third offense by introducing a certified copy of his driving record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11489 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Anthony Lee v. C.O. Lutzow
is whether the committee provided Lee with due process. We conclude that the record is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7952 - 2017-09-19
is whether the committee provided Lee with due process. We conclude that the record is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7952 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven R. Lineberry
. After an independent review of the record, we conclude that the issues identified by counsel lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8653 - 2005-03-31
. After an independent review of the record, we conclude that the issues identified by counsel lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8653 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the record did not contain the official toxicology test result or form DOC-77, which addresses statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34248 - 2008-10-08
the record did not contain the official toxicology test result or form DOC-77, which addresses statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34248 - 2008-10-08
Robert Anthony Lee v. C.O. Lutzow
the committee provided Lee with due process. We conclude that the record is insufficient to decide this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7952 - 2005-03-31
the committee provided Lee with due process. We conclude that the record is insufficient to decide this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7952 - 2005-03-31