Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 20930 for word.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 20930 for word.
2008 WI APP 28
the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, we do not look beyond the plain words. Id. If the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, we do not look beyond the plain words. Id. If the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Michael G.
that they could try to put in a good word for them if they talked about the incident. The following day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2639 - 2017-09-19
that they could try to put in a good word for them if they talked about the incident. The following day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2639 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
be in the form of words, gesture, or conduct. State v. Tomlinson, 2002 WI 91, ¶37, 254 Wis. 2d 502, 648 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
be in the form of words, gesture, or conduct. State v. Tomlinson, 2002 WI 91, ¶37, 254 Wis. 2d 502, 648 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
rendered the original judgment. Durfee v. Duke, 375 U.S. 106, 111 (1963) (emphasis added). In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31143 - 2007-12-10
rendered the original judgment. Durfee v. Duke, 375 U.S. 106, 111 (1963) (emphasis added). In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31143 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
WI APP 240
).” No. 2006AP265 5 WEBSTER’S THIRD NEW INT’L DICTIONARY 611 (Unabr. 1993). In other words, “design
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26839 - 2014-09-15
).” No. 2006AP265 5 WEBSTER’S THIRD NEW INT’L DICTIONARY 611 (Unabr. 1993). In other words, “design
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26839 - 2014-09-15
State v. Pedro Figueroa
(Ct. App. 1977). We look first to the words of the statute, and if the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16168 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1977). We look first to the words of the statute, and if the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Sheboygan v. Rodney G.R.
utter “magic words.” We do not believe that the trial court’s failure to utter the precise “magic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4953 - 2017-09-19
utter “magic words.” We do not believe that the trial court’s failure to utter the precise “magic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4953 - 2017-09-19
State v. Quentin L. Rogers
to forcefully take his property by threatening the imminent use of a weapon. He conveyed that Rogers, by words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14655 - 2005-03-31
to forcefully take his property by threatening the imminent use of a weapon. He conveyed that Rogers, by words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14655 - 2005-03-31
State v. Betsy H.
: “All words and phrases shall be construed according to common and approved usage; but technical words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3174 - 2005-03-31
: “All words and phrases shall be construed according to common and approved usage; but technical words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3174 - 2005-03-31
Town of Wautoma v. City of Wautoma
position is that the word “may” in the general statute, § 66.021(2), controls and makes filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12026 - 2005-03-31
position is that the word “may” in the general statute, § 66.021(2), controls and makes filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12026 - 2005-03-31