Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 20855 for word.
Search results 1661 - 1670 of 20855 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Pedro Figueroa
277, 281, 570 N.W.2d 582 (Ct. App. 1977). We look first to the words of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16168 - 2017-09-21
277, 281, 570 N.W.2d 582 (Ct. App. 1977). We look first to the words of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16168 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leigh A. Pedretti
asked the actual words Pedretti used, Officer Howland answered: “‘Fucking pigs,’ just words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12028 - 2017-09-21
asked the actual words Pedretti used, Officer Howland answered: “‘Fucking pigs,’ just words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12028 - 2017-09-21
State v. George Schertz
added.) Schertz maintains that the word “shall” makes this provision mandatory. However, statutory time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5073 - 2005-03-31
added.) Schertz maintains that the word “shall” makes this provision mandatory. However, statutory time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5073 - 2005-03-31
State v. Quentin L. Rogers
to forcefully take his property by threatening the imminent use of a weapon. He conveyed that Rogers, by words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14655 - 2005-03-31
to forcefully take his property by threatening the imminent use of a weapon. He conveyed that Rogers, by words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14655 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bruce Mooren v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.
. Smith v. Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co., 155 Wis.2d 808, 811, 456 N.W.2d 597, 598-99 (1990). Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14908 - 2017-09-21
. Smith v. Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co., 155 Wis.2d 808, 811, 456 N.W.2d 597, 598-99 (1990). Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14908 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 28
the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, we do not look beyond the plain words. Id. If the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, we do not look beyond the plain words. Id. If the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Quentin L. Rogers
, by words and gestures, “was trying to convince me that he had a gun in his pocket.” Rogers, apprehended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14655 - 2017-09-21
, by words and gestures, “was trying to convince me that he had a gun in his pocket.” Rogers, apprehended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14655 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Contardi v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
. In this case, the words of the order do not indicate that another document will be entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6806 - 2005-03-31
. In this case, the words of the order do not indicate that another document will be entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6806 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pedro Figueroa
(Ct. App. 1977). We look first to the words of the statute, and if the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16168 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1977). We look first to the words of the statute, and if the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16168 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“presume[s] the parties’ intent is evidenced by the words they choose, if those words are unambiguous.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106463 - 2014-01-08
“presume[s] the parties’ intent is evidenced by the words they choose, if those words are unambiguous.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106463 - 2014-01-08