Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16601 - 16610 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 16601 - 16610 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
WI APP 48
examination where Jungwirth claimed that about $2000 had been withheld from his final payment on the project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31857 - 2014-09-15
examination where Jungwirth claimed that about $2000 had been withheld from his final payment on the project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31857 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
We affirm. Cowins’ postconviction motion raises four primary claims, several of which involve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133877 - 2017-09-21
We affirm. Cowins’ postconviction motion raises four primary claims, several of which involve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
contends Obriecht’s present claims are procedurally barred, and further requests limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
contends Obriecht’s present claims are procedurally barred, and further requests limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
there would be arguable merit to a claim that Witz’s trial lawyer was constitutionally ineffective. Witz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
there would be arguable merit to a claim that Witz’s trial lawyer was constitutionally ineffective. Witz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
PER CURIAM. Joseph Dremsa and Machelle Dremsa appeal a judgment that, in part, rejected their claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26848 - 2006-10-18
PER CURIAM. Joseph Dremsa and Machelle Dremsa appeal a judgment that, in part, rejected their claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26848 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2019-20).1 He claims that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial in these matters. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
(2019-20).1 He claims that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial in these matters. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
David Pender v. City of Appleton
upon his premises. He claims that: (1) the trial court failed to suppress illegally obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15119 - 2017-09-21
upon his premises. He claims that: (1) the trial court failed to suppress illegally obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15119 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Bernhard Trivalos v. F.H. Resort Limited Partnership
his claim of negligent bailment and conversion. Because we agree with the trial court that F.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3542 - 2017-09-19
his claim of negligent bailment and conversion. Because we agree with the trial court that F.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3542 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FRW Corporation v. City of New Berlin
for the period before FRW filed a notice of claim with the city.1 We affirm the judgment in its entirety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7789 - 2017-09-19
for the period before FRW filed a notice of claim with the city.1 We affirm the judgment in its entirety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7789 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patricia LaBelle
, contrary to §§ 943.20(1)(a) and 943.20(3)(b), STATS. LaBelle raises three claims of error: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13704 - 2014-09-15
, contrary to §§ 943.20(1)(a) and 943.20(3)(b), STATS. LaBelle raises three claims of error: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13704 - 2014-09-15