Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16601 - 16610 of 53151 for address.

CA Blank Order
449 (1987), aff’d, 486 U.S. 429 (1988). The no-merit report addresses the plea and sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104262 - 2013-11-10

[PDF] NOTICE
action at that point. The court did not address the No. 2007AP1411-CR 2 State’s additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15

Charmane T. Barber v. Kelly J. Barber
in his argument to the trial court,[2] there was no need for the trial court to specifically address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26591 - 2006-09-27

State v. Javier Belmontes
to address the court prior to sentencing. Furthermore, at the time of sentencing, counsel could not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15433 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
809.21. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would be any basis for arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170707 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
facts to him. Because this claim was not pled or pursued in the circuit court, we do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94665 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
confidential statements from her client to address that issue. Therefore, she would only reveal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101903 - 2017-09-21

State v. Matthew S. Olsen
in his case. The State fails to address this testimony. ¶7 Having concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25922 - 2006-07-17

CA Blank Order
. 429 (1988). The no-merit report addresses whether Grover has grounds for plea withdrawal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102281 - 2013-09-22

COURT OF APPEALS
, the sentencing court must address three primary factors: the nature of the offense, the character of the offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37585 - 2009-07-14