Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16601 - 16610 of 98407 for court records search online.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 19, 2023 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679069 - 2023-07-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The court’s findings are all supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. ¶20 LaCrosse’s final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898233 - 2025-01-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the court did not need to address this relationship on the record. It would be absurd to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179222 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 8, 2023 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687574 - 2023-08-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the evidence in the record was not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court properly ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179778 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
day, July 24. Thus, we have no record of the postconviction court’s actions on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433136 - 2021-09-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a type of mixed property). On this record, the circuit court’s finding that the parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196615 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 980.09(2) has since been amended and now requires the court to deny the petition unless “the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192264 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
could. The record demonstrates that with the court’s consideration of Meixensperger’s reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288451 - 2020-09-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108218 - 2017-09-21