Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16601 - 16610 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16601 - 16610 of 29823 for des.
Douglas Dietzen v. Diane Hardt
of the trial court's decision to grant summary judgment is de novo. Stann v. Waukesha County, 161 Wis.2d 808
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8124 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court's decision to grant summary judgment is de novo. Stann v. Waukesha County, 161 Wis.2d 808
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8124 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶31. ¶8 Here, Williams argues that the plea colloquy was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶31. ¶8 Here, Williams argues that the plea colloquy was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. M. Joanne Wolf
Proceedings Against Des Jardins, 163 Wis. 2d 969, 472 N.W.2d 925 (1991), a case, like this, where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16436 - 2017-09-21
Proceedings Against Des Jardins, 163 Wis. 2d 969, 472 N.W.2d 925 (1991), a case, like this, where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16436 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dann P. Knippel
facts to the constitutional requirement of consent is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31
facts to the constitutional requirement of consent is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel L. Gaulrapp
, presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Jackson, 147 Wis.2d 824, 829, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10688 - 2005-03-31
, presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Jackson, 147 Wis.2d 824, 829, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10688 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See Schapiro v. Security Savings & Loan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118317 - 2014-07-28
de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See Schapiro v. Security Savings & Loan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118317 - 2014-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Renee A. Fredel
constitute probable cause is a question of law, which we review de novo. Village of Elkhart Lake v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9725 - 2017-09-19
constitute probable cause is a question of law, which we review de novo. Village of Elkhart Lake v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9725 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Wangard Partners, Inc. v. Tandem Tire and Auto Service, Inc.
is valid and enforceable is a question of law we decide de novo. See Cavanaugh v. Andrade, 191 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20067 - 2017-09-21
is valid and enforceable is a question of law we decide de novo. See Cavanaugh v. Andrade, 191 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roy F. Bartels v. Rural Mutual Insurance Company
perform the same function as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7161 - 2017-09-20
perform the same function as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7161 - 2017-09-20
State v. Renee A. Fredel
the facts as found by the trial court constitute probable cause is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31
the facts as found by the trial court constitute probable cause is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31