Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16601 - 16610 of 50086 for our.
Search results 16601 - 16610 of 50086 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
a statute, our purpose is to determine the legislature’s intent and give it effect. Id. We first examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33879 - 2008-09-02
a statute, our purpose is to determine the legislature’s intent and give it effect. Id. We first examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33879 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
Joseph J. Savage v. David H. Schwarz
ex rel. Simpson v. Schwarz, 2002 WI App 7, ¶10, 250 Wis. 2d 214, 640 N.W.2d 527. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5081 - 2005-03-31
ex rel. Simpson v. Schwarz, 2002 WI App 7, ¶10, 250 Wis. 2d 214, 640 N.W.2d 527. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert K.
Application of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7640 - 2017-09-19
Application of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7640 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the primary objectives of Radford’s sentence.” (Emphasis in original.) Our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766224 - 2024-02-20
with the primary objectives of Radford’s sentence.” (Emphasis in original.) Our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766224 - 2024-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501431 - 2022-03-31
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501431 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and text messages that implicated Bell. Based on our review of the trial transcript and other evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252476 - 2020-01-13
and text messages that implicated Bell. Based on our review of the trial transcript and other evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252476 - 2020-01-13
Luann Gehin v. Wisconsin Group Insurance Board
evidence. The board appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶8 Our certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6093 - 2005-03-31
evidence. The board appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶8 Our certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6093 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our review of the record, which includes the case manager’s testimony and documentary evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020740 - 2025-10-14
. Our review of the record, which includes the case manager’s testimony and documentary evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020740 - 2025-10-14
State v. Ray A. Schiller
in the standard jury instruction. ¶4 Our supreme court has already decided this issue. As Schiller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3901 - 2005-03-31
in the standard jury instruction. ¶4 Our supreme court has already decided this issue. As Schiller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3901 - 2005-03-31