Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16611 - 16620 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16611 - 16620 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
County of Dane v. Sherman C. Sporle
” and “additional” tests, our review is de novo. State v. Vincent, 171 Wis. 2d 124, 127, 490 N.W.2d 761 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31
” and “additional” tests, our review is de novo. State v. Vincent, 171 Wis. 2d 124, 127, 490 N.W.2d 761 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous. Id. This court reviews de novo whether an investigatory detention was justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79224 - 2014-09-15
clearly erroneous. Id. This court reviews de novo whether an investigatory detention was justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79224 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Worden
. Statutory construction presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2116 - 2017-09-19
. Statutory construction presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2116 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law which we review de novo. Juneau County v. Sauk County, 217 Wis. 2d 705, 709, 580 N.W.2d 694 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218962 - 2018-09-12
of law which we review de novo. Juneau County v. Sauk County, 217 Wis. 2d 705, 709, 580 N.W.2d 694 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218962 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
137 (1997). The referee's conclusions of law, however, are subject to de novo review. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20614 - 2017-09-21
137 (1997). The referee's conclusions of law, however, are subject to de novo review. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20614 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Davidson, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69580 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Davidson, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69580 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Johnny Bohannon
is de novo, see State v. Angiolo, 186 Wis.2d 488, 494–495, 520 N.W.2d 923, 927 (Ct. App. 1994), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9051 - 2017-09-19
is de novo, see State v. Angiolo, 186 Wis.2d 488, 494–495, 520 N.W.2d 923, 927 (Ct. App. 1994), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9051 - 2017-09-19
State v. James W. Rice, Jr.
is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73, 535 N.W.2d 124 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2555 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73, 535 N.W.2d 124 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2555 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31