Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16621 - 16630 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16621 - 16630 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
Dane Co. DHS v. Shetria B.
on undisputed facts is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20
on undisputed facts is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20
[PDF]
Morgan Products, Ltd. v. Park Plaza of Oshkosh, Inc.
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14478 - 2017-09-21
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneous. State v. Johnson, 2007 WI 32, ¶13, 299 Wis. 2d 675, 729 N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939103 - 2025-04-10
erroneous. State v. Johnson, 2007 WI 32, ¶13, 299 Wis. 2d 675, 729 N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939103 - 2025-04-10
James J. Kaufman v. Judy P. Smith
by Wis. Stat. § 893.735(2). Our review of the dismissal is de novo. See State ex rel. Johnson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5120 - 2005-03-31
by Wis. Stat. § 893.735(2). Our review of the dismissal is de novo. See State ex rel. Johnson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a de novo review of a contract, see, e.g., Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191528 - 2017-09-21
to a de novo review of a contract, see, e.g., Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191528 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William R. Scott
. 1989). Whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3407 - 2017-09-19
. 1989). Whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3407 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted and italics added). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted and italics added). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Glenn Turner
establishes a prima facie case is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Moederndorfer, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7227 - 2017-09-20
establishes a prima facie case is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Moederndorfer, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7227 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107616 - 2017-09-21
of law we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107616 - 2017-09-21