Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16621 - 16630 of 49813 for our.
Search results 16621 - 16630 of 49813 for our.
State v. Charlotte Kotlov
represented her at the sentencing hearing failed to do so, and, under our de novo review, we cannot say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11545 - 2005-03-31
represented her at the sentencing hearing failed to do so, and, under our de novo review, we cannot say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11545 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Tingler argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812731 - 2024-06-12
. Tingler argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812731 - 2024-06-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Based upon our standard of review, we conclude the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998996 - 2025-08-19
Based upon our standard of review, we conclude the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998996 - 2025-08-19
Larry Tiepelman v. Phil Kingston
timeliness for judicial review. Our certiorari review is limited to the record created before the committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14252 - 2005-03-31
timeliness for judicial review. Our certiorari review is limited to the record created before the committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the circuit court’s sentencing decision, our review of the record confirms that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821130 - 2024-07-03
to the circuit court’s sentencing decision, our review of the record confirms that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821130 - 2024-07-03
[PDF]
Hudec Law Offices v. Darlyne Esser
) (“our review is limited to the record”). As the appellant, Esser is responsible for ensuring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6426 - 2017-09-19
) (“our review is limited to the record”). As the appellant, Esser is responsible for ensuring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6426 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brian L. Paarmann
, our review is not limited to the factors constituting the reasonable parameters of a community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8550 - 2005-03-31
, our review is not limited to the factors constituting the reasonable parameters of a community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8550 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Appleton v. Alan F. Schleinz
541 (1999), our supreme court discussed the meaning of the phrase “probable cause to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7432 - 2017-09-20
541 (1999), our supreme court discussed the meaning of the phrase “probable cause to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7432 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
thirty consecutive days in jail.[4] ¶12 Furthermore, our review of the transcript of the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31684 - 2008-01-30
thirty consecutive days in jail.[4] ¶12 Furthermore, our review of the transcript of the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31684 - 2008-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
, our inquiry is whether “the evidence sufficiently undermines the court’s confidence in the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123250 - 2014-10-06
, our inquiry is whether “the evidence sufficiently undermines the court’s confidence in the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123250 - 2014-10-06