Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16631 - 16640 of 59222 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 16631 - 16640 of 59222 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
proceedings that the § 974.06 motion failed to state any claim upon which relief could be granted. We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862944 - 2024-10-15
proceedings that the § 974.06 motion failed to state any claim upon which relief could be granted. We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862944 - 2024-10-15
[PDF]
State v. William W. Gandt
)(a), and 346.65(2), STATS. Gandt claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
)(a), and 346.65(2), STATS. Gandt claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
raises about plea withdrawal; the alleged defects in the arrest warrant and his claim of self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44870 - 2014-09-15
raises about plea withdrawal; the alleged defects in the arrest warrant and his claim of self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44870 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
] We reject Ringold’s claims and affirm. In 2002, following a jury trial, Ringold was sentenced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93581 - 2013-03-05
] We reject Ringold’s claims and affirm. In 2002, following a jury trial, Ringold was sentenced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93581 - 2013-03-05
State v. William W. Gandt
)(a), and 346.65(2), Stats. Gandt claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
)(a), and 346.65(2), Stats. Gandt claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bobby Joe Smith
; (2) whether the trial court properly refused to consider Smith's claim that he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8295 - 2017-09-19
; (2) whether the trial court properly refused to consider Smith's claim that he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8295 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. We conclude that Husbeck’s claim is procedurally barred under § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05
is appropriate for summary disposition. We conclude that Husbeck’s claim is procedurally barred under § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
; the alleged defects in the arrest warrant and his claim of self-defense have already been decided. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44870 - 2009-12-21
; the alleged defects in the arrest warrant and his claim of self-defense have already been decided. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44870 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 974.06, his claims were procedurally barred. No. 2020AP1207 3 Then Carpenter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581349 - 2022-10-25
. STAT. § 974.06, his claims were procedurally barred. No. 2020AP1207 3 Then Carpenter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581349 - 2022-10-25
VIP Construction, Inc. v. Rajko Andeljkovic
in Racine, Wisconsin. Rajko’s parents previously owned the Racine property. They quit claimed the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6620 - 2005-03-31
in Racine, Wisconsin. Rajko’s parents previously owned the Racine property. They quit claimed the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6620 - 2005-03-31