Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16631 - 16640 of 29810 for des.
Search results 16631 - 16640 of 29810 for des.
State v. Johnny Bohannon
with the Fourth Amendment is de novo, see State v. Angiolo, 186 Wis.2d 488, 494–495, 520 N.W.2d 923, 927 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9051 - 2005-03-31
with the Fourth Amendment is de novo, see State v. Angiolo, 186 Wis.2d 488, 494–495, 520 N.W.2d 923, 927 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9051 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130390 - 2014-11-30
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130390 - 2014-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by law eliminates summary judgment.” We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118317 - 2014-09-15
by law eliminates summary judgment.” We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118317 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 8, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co. v. Vorbeck, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37243 - 2009-07-07
present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co. v. Vorbeck, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37243 - 2009-07-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
State v. Aaron J. Grender
we review de novo. State v. Gammons, 2001 WI App 36, ¶6, 241 Wis. 2d 296, 625 N.W.2d 623. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7524 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. State v. Gammons, 2001 WI App 36, ¶6, 241 Wis. 2d 296, 625 N.W.2d 623. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7524 - 2005-03-31
Joshua D. Hansen v. Carl H. Degnitz
interpret the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17882 - 2005-05-24
interpret the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17882 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Keepers
reviews de novo. See id. at 634. No. 00-0475-CR 6 ¶10 Keepers argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2284 - 2017-09-19
reviews de novo. See id. at 634. No. 00-0475-CR 6 ¶10 Keepers argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2284 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, our review is de novo. Id., ¶39. ¶7 EE argues that the circuit court erred in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35714 - 2009-03-03
, our review is de novo. Id., ¶39. ¶7 EE argues that the circuit court erred in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35714 - 2009-03-03
[PDF]
State v. Christopher E. Betow
, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. There is no question that a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14443 - 2017-09-21
, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. There is no question that a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14443 - 2017-09-21