Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16631 - 16640 of 29739 for des.
Search results 16631 - 16640 of 29739 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that requested a trial de novo with a six-person jury instead of a trial on the record. ¶4 The matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53101 - 2014-09-15
that requested a trial de novo with a six-person jury instead of a trial on the record. ¶4 The matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53101 - 2014-09-15
Paula M.S. v. Neal A.R.
, § 805.17(2), Stats., we review de novo the circuit court’s legal conclusion that statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13923 - 2005-03-31
, § 805.17(2), Stats., we review de novo the circuit court’s legal conclusion that statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13923 - 2005-03-31
University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Committee
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16146 - 2005-03-31
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16146 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court noted that “[w]hile all of the violations, even taken as a whole, can be viewed in a vacuum as de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108638 - 2014-03-04
court noted that “[w]hile all of the violations, even taken as a whole, can be viewed in a vacuum as de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108638 - 2014-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. II. Application Of Standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31447 - 2008-01-09
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. II. Application Of Standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31447 - 2008-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we decide de novo whether those facts demonstrate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362235 - 2021-05-05
of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we decide de novo whether those facts demonstrate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362235 - 2021-05-05
[PDF]
Marvin Poirier v. Town of Howard
. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means of judicial review when the taxpayer claims an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2105 - 2017-09-19
. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means of judicial review when the taxpayer claims an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2105 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d at 211. ¶5 Based on the largely undisputed testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76968 - 2012-01-24
we review de novo. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d at 211. ¶5 Based on the largely undisputed testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76968 - 2012-01-24
Eugene C. Wiedmeyer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin
, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15102 - 2005-03-31
, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rainbow Springs Golf Company, Inc. v. Town of Mukwonago
a claim, we review the circuit court’s action de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18336 - 2017-09-21
a claim, we review the circuit court’s action de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18336 - 2017-09-21