Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16641 - 16650 of 30115 for de.

State v. Steven A. Conway
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8680 - 2005-03-31

Bernard Willkomm v. Romeo Soriano, M.D.
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3618 - 2005-03-31

State v. Samuel Jones
prosecutorial vindictiveness claims present questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. at ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
court noted that “[w]hile all of the violations, even taken as a whole, can be viewed in a vacuum as de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108638 - 2014-03-04

Winnebago County Department of Human Services v. Nannette C.
was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law that we review de novo. Flores, 183 Wis. 2d at 609
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6345 - 2005-03-31

wI APP 37 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1578 Complete Title of...
court’s order granting a defendant’s motion to dismiss is de novo. Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Grade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107521 - 2014-03-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390669 - 2021-07-14

COURT OF APPEALS
in relation to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Turner v. Gene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“a reasonable conclusion using a demonstrated rational process.” Id. We review de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180526 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Marvin Poirier v. Town of Howard
. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means of judicial review when the taxpayer claims an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2105 - 2017-09-19