Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16641 - 16650 of 29796 for des.
Search results 16641 - 16650 of 29796 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, which “is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27
interpretation, which “is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27
State v. April O.
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16018 - 2005-03-31
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16018 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
City of Mequon v. Sarah J. Peacock
review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary detention of a citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5348 - 2017-09-19
review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary detention of a citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5348 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joel P. Hoffman
amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review No. 02-0009-CR 3 de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4785 - 2017-09-19
amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review No. 02-0009-CR 3 de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4785 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de novo review, applies ‘where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97649 - 2014-09-15
source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de novo review, applies ‘where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97649 - 2014-09-15
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
. Whether a defendant's statement was voluntary is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a defendant's statement was voluntary is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
Randall G. Horlacher v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
(Ct. App. 1995). We address the issues without deference to the trial court and review the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4914 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1995). We address the issues without deference to the trial court and review the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Roger Philbrick v. Tony Schroeckenthaler
small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6464 - 2017-09-19
small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6464 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
issues seriatim. A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77326 - 2012-01-30
issues seriatim. A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77326 - 2012-01-30