Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16641 - 16650 of 39945 for financial disclosure statement.

State v. Timothy D. Kingstad
a request to enter a no contest plea and waiver of rights. The request included a statement indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12841 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tamar T. Brown
consistent with her statements to police that she had purchased the cocaine from Brown. Before submitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20587 - 2005-12-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for an adjournment to review the disc, compare it with K.W.’s other statements and, if necessary, redact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190510 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to investigate and rebut certain statements in the presentence investigation report (“PSI”). We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174413 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jamerrel Everett
At the ensuing jury trial, Everett sought to testify about certain statements that Jerry K., also a resident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21

WI App 104 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1228-CR Complete Ti...
. Specifically, Lathan moved to suppress statements he made while in police custody, recorded phone calls made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65356 - 2011-07-25

COURT OF APPEALS
, that certain statements “so infected the [proceedings] with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139830 - 2015-04-14

[PDF] WI App 104
at Lathan’s suppression hearing as to Darrough’s statements regarding the phone call from Howze. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65356 - 2014-09-15

State v. Carlos Santiago
. Santiago later made a custodial statement to police admitting that the marijuana found in the bedroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7862 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
based upon three new factors: (1) the State’s incorrect statement at the beginning of the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696573 - 2023-08-29