Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16651 - 16660 of 29722 for des.
Search results 16651 - 16660 of 29722 for des.
Winnebago County v. The Winnebago County Courthouse Employees Association
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8126 - 2005-03-31
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-in-chief argues for a wholesale de novo standard of review, given their arguments it appears a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
-in-chief argues for a wholesale de novo standard of review, given their arguments it appears a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
motion are barred by a previous direct appeal is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56888 - 2010-11-17
motion are barred by a previous direct appeal is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56888 - 2010-11-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
reasonable suspicion such that the stop was constitutional is a question we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32740 - 2014-09-15
reasonable suspicion such that the stop was constitutional is a question we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32740 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony T. Jones
the constitutional test of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Ferguson, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24927 - 2006-04-26
the constitutional test of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Ferguson, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24927 - 2006-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
: robert de chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50218 - 2010-05-19
: robert de chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50218 - 2010-05-19
[PDF]
Jeffrey S. * v. Thomas A.f. *
the issue as one of law, our review is de novo. And they bolster their argument by referring us to cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9151 - 2017-09-19
the issue as one of law, our review is de novo. And they bolster their argument by referring us to cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9151 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will decide de novo whether those facts satisfy the constitutional standard. State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904186 - 2025-01-22
will decide de novo whether those facts satisfy the constitutional standard. State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904186 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
Cathy Strozinsky v. School District of Brown Deer
. This appeal followed. II. ANALYSIS. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13641 - 2017-09-21
. This appeal followed. II. ANALYSIS. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13641 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the interpretation of those documents governing the Associations, our review is de novo. See Solowicz v. Forward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113795 - 2017-09-21
for the interpretation of those documents governing the Associations, our review is de novo. See Solowicz v. Forward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113795 - 2017-09-21