Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16661 - 16670 of 43756 for WA 0859 3970 0884 [[HATIGA]] Biaya Borongan Kitchen Set Bahan Bagus Terpercaya Ceper Klaten.
Search results 16661 - 16670 of 43756 for WA 0859 3970 0884 [[HATIGA]] Biaya Borongan Kitchen Set Bahan Bagus Terpercaya Ceper Klaten.
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Arpke
a question of law based upon an undisputed set of facts, which we review de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3625 - 2017-09-19
a question of law based upon an undisputed set of facts, which we review de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3625 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215180 - 2018-07-02
” is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215180 - 2018-07-02
[PDF]
State v. Travis Joe Adams
with the requirements set forth in State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 260-62, 389 N.W.2d 12, 20-21 (1986), to insure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15112 - 2017-09-21
with the requirements set forth in State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 260-62, 389 N.W.2d 12, 20-21 (1986), to insure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15112 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report sets forth an adequate discussion of the potential issues to support the no-merit conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887729 - 2024-12-10
report sets forth an adequate discussion of the potential issues to support the no-merit conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887729 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
might have been litigated in the former proceedings.’” Ibid. (footnote, citation and one set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155960 - 2017-09-21
might have been litigated in the former proceedings.’” Ibid. (footnote, citation and one set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155960 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in prison for that offense, and “decline[d] to set a parole eligibility date,” leaving that determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33465 - 2008-07-21
in prison for that offense, and “decline[d] to set a parole eligibility date,” leaving that determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33465 - 2008-07-21
State v. Reginald J. Baskin
therefore complied with the requirements set forth in State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 261-62, 389 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12185 - 2005-03-31
therefore complied with the requirements set forth in State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 261-62, 389 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12185 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A new factor is a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86137 - 2014-09-15
A new factor is a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86137 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2016AP2349-NM 3 The no-merit report addresses whether the court erred in setting disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204113 - 2017-11-28
. No. 2016AP2349-NM 3 The no-merit report addresses whether the court erred in setting disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204113 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975) (a new sentencing factor is a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92721 - 2014-09-15
, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975) (a new sentencing factor is a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92721 - 2014-09-15