Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16661 - 16670 of 29721 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we determine de novo. State v. Jackson, 2016 WI 56, ¶45, 369 Wis. 2d 673, 882 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462785 - 2021-12-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argument that the circuit court’s failure to use the term “best interests” in its analysis does not de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597208 - 2022-12-06

[PDF] State v. Glenn Turner
establishes a prima facie case is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Moederndorfer, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7227 - 2017-09-20

State v. Jeffrey J. Rittenhouse
are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3385 - 2005-03-31

State v. Henry Pocan
… decision is de novo …. [We] will search the record for any substantial ground based on competent evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18852 - 2005-07-05

The Estate of Mildred Furgason and the Estate of John Furgason v.
one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11503 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review de novo. State v. Neuaone, 2005 WI App 124, ¶16, 284 Wis. 2d 473, 700 N.W.2d 298. We presume
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232055 - 2019-01-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. If the motion is not sufficient, or if it presents only conclusory allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83649 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert H. Miller
is a legal question that we decide de novo. In State v. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d 529, 494 N.W.2d 399 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5742 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leon J. Seese
standard of probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Turner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13079 - 2005-03-31