Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16671 - 16680 of 30097 for de.
Search results 16671 - 16680 of 30097 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Dwayne E. Thompson
of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13235 - 2017-09-21
of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13235 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo the application of undisputed facts to constitutional principles. See County of Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415504 - 2021-08-25
review de novo the application of undisputed facts to constitutional principles. See County of Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415504 - 2021-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was constitutionally ineffective is a question of law reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74183 - 2011-11-21
performance was constitutionally ineffective is a question of law reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74183 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and for protective placement are questions of law that we review de novo. See Walworth County v. Therese B., 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598005 - 2022-12-06
and for protective placement are questions of law that we review de novo. See Walworth County v. Therese B., 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598005 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
State v. John T. Werner
of law we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3297 - 2017-09-19
of law we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3297 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 183
of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34520 - 2014-09-15
of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34520 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, after its de novo review, finding that Officer Tuschl had reasonable suspicion to stop Schneidler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04
, after its de novo review, finding that Officer Tuschl had reasonable suspicion to stop Schneidler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54241 - 2010-09-08
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54241 - 2010-09-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneous. State v. Johnson, 2007 WI 32, ¶13, 299 Wis. 2d 675, 729 N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939103 - 2025-04-10
erroneous. State v. Johnson, 2007 WI 32, ¶13, 299 Wis. 2d 675, 729 N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939103 - 2025-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfy the statutory standards is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. S.H., 393 Wis. 2d 511
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795278 - 2024-05-01
satisfy the statutory standards is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. S.H., 393 Wis. 2d 511
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795278 - 2024-05-01