Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16671 - 16680 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 99
a de novo review because the issues are issues of law and the facts are undisputed. See Gielow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50541 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and Williams appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71554 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation and the application of a statute to a given set of facts are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407378 - 2021-08-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
it is clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts meet constitutional No. 2011AP1523
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83738 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, but the application of those facts to constitutional principles is subject to de novo review. State v. Mosher, 221
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124945 - 2014-10-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
disagree. ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73242 - 2014-09-15

WI App 4 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2243-CR Complete Title ...
Trial Statute. This is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Davis, 2001 WI 136, ¶¶3-4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105578 - 2014-01-28

COURT OF APPEALS
, on the other hand, is a question of law, which we review de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135731 - 2015-02-25

State v. Earl W. Haase
of law that we review de novo. State v. Storlie, 2002 WI App 163, ¶6, 256 Wis. 2d 500, 647 N.W.2d 926
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30

COURT OF APPEALS
notice of appeal that requested a trial de novo with a six‑person jury instead of a trial on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53101 - 2010-08-09