Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16671 - 16680 of 68276 for did.
Search results 16671 - 16680 of 68276 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it “significant” and “troubling” that McConochie did not understand the “depth of the loss that they have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235764 - 2019-02-20
it “significant” and “troubling” that McConochie did not understand the “depth of the loss that they have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235764 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the State; however, he stated that he did not remember many details about the fight, including who he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
the State; however, he stated that he did not remember many details about the fight, including who he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
then asked L.C.: A day later did you then tell [your coworker] that you believed [the victim] and that you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
then asked L.C.: A day later did you then tell [your coworker] that you believed [the victim] and that you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Glenn R. Reetz
-2006 -3- Both officers stated that they did not inform Reetz he was under arrest or give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11106 - 2017-09-19
-2006 -3- Both officers stated that they did not inform Reetz he was under arrest or give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11106 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” on predisposition supervision and did not have any negative reports. James’ counsel stated that if James did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800910 - 2024-05-14
” on predisposition supervision and did not have any negative reports. James’ counsel stated that if James did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800910 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
accomplice unless it was because he was an accomplice. The officer who interrogated Rea did not know any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31934 - 2014-09-15
accomplice unless it was because he was an accomplice. The officer who interrogated Rea did not know any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31934 - 2014-09-15
State v. David W. Stokes
of drinking, Stokes shot and killed Kevin Parr and seriously wounded Vicki Parr. Stokes did not get along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
of drinking, Stokes shot and killed Kevin Parr and seriously wounded Vicki Parr. Stokes did not get along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Krier
. Finally, Krier agreed to take the test. He testified that he did so because Deputy Olson claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
. Finally, Krier agreed to take the test. He testified that he did so because Deputy Olson claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Stokes
of drinking, Stokes shot and killed Kevin Parr and seriously wounded Vicki Parr. Stokes did not get along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7897 - 2005-03-31
of drinking, Stokes shot and killed Kevin Parr and seriously wounded Vicki Parr. Stokes did not get along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7897 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott A. Teasdale
home. Among other things, the State argues that even if the officers did unlawfully enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16005 - 2005-03-31
home. Among other things, the State argues that even if the officers did unlawfully enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16005 - 2005-03-31