Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16681 - 16690 of 70259 for his.
Search results 16681 - 16690 of 70259 for his.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Postconviction, Montour argued that his trial counsel was ineffective. After an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217403 - 2018-08-15
. Postconviction, Montour argued that his trial counsel was ineffective. After an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217403 - 2018-08-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, fifth offense, and an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26805 - 2014-09-15
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, fifth offense, and an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26805 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184943 - 2017-09-21
court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184943 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Jones
his conviction for attempted armed robbery as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11562 - 2017-09-19
his conviction for attempted armed robbery as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11562 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence A. Williams
and, as a result, his consent to search was invalid. We agree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3626 - 2017-09-19
and, as a result, his consent to search was invalid. We agree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3626 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
drug possession charges and an order denying his postconviction motion. Moore argues he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38346 - 2009-07-27
drug possession charges and an order denying his postconviction motion. Moore argues he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38346 - 2009-07-27
State v. Nels H. Rieth
) and 943.20(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6186 - 2005-03-31
) and 943.20(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6186 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael B. Ilkka
stated. Ilkka was charged in Iowa County with fourth-offense drunk driving. After denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16175 - 2005-03-31
stated. Ilkka was charged in Iowa County with fourth-offense drunk driving. After denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16175 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith L. Allen
to twenty-five percent of his prison earnings account. Allen was granted 242 days of credit for presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10642 - 2005-03-31
to twenty-five percent of his prison earnings account. Allen was granted 242 days of credit for presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10642 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas L. Gillen
. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] Gillen also appeals the order denying his motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] Gillen also appeals the order denying his motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31