Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16681 - 16690 of 73361 for we.
Search results 16681 - 16690 of 73361 for we.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259606 - 2020-05-06
as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259606 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court erred by denying his suppression motions, but we conclude the dispositive issue is harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
that the court erred by denying his suppression motions, but we conclude the dispositive issue is harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Marian R. Crosswhite v. Deborah L. Zivko
testimony rebutted the presumption that the transfer was made with donative intent, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9495 - 2017-09-19
testimony rebutted the presumption that the transfer was made with donative intent, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9495 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eddie L. Johnikin
not be charged with homicide should the victim of the battery die in the future. We conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18695 - 2005-06-27
not be charged with homicide should the victim of the battery die in the future. We conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18695 - 2005-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
did not resolve the prejudice, and that he should get a new trial. We hold that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48541 - 2010-03-30
did not resolve the prejudice, and that he should get a new trial. We hold that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48541 - 2010-03-30
[PDF]
State v. Stephen J. Weissenberger, Jr.
petition was filed. However, because we conclude that Weissenberger received the proper amount of credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13493 - 2017-09-21
petition was filed. However, because we conclude that Weissenberger received the proper amount of credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13493 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bart E. Jenson
sentencing discretion, and whether the prosecutor’s improper closing arguments warrant a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6382 - 2005-03-31
sentencing discretion, and whether the prosecutor’s improper closing arguments warrant a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6382 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
within the meaning of Anders and RULE 809.32, we reject the no-merit report. After a five-day jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149129 - 2017-09-21
within the meaning of Anders and RULE 809.32, we reject the no-merit report. After a five-day jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149129 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
language about costs in the dismissal order. We affirm. ¶2 The DeGraffs filed suit in their capacities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241021 - 2019-05-23
language about costs in the dismissal order. We affirm. ¶2 The DeGraffs filed suit in their capacities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241021 - 2019-05-23
[PDF]
City of Kiel v. Michael T. Roehrig
initial detention of him was illegal under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). We reject Roehrig’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12235 - 2017-09-21
initial detention of him was illegal under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). We reject Roehrig’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12235 - 2017-09-21