Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16691 - 16700 of 98408 for court records search online.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 16, 2023 Samuel A. Christensen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689074 - 2023-08-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of discretion. See id. at 68. The circuit court’s exercise of discretion will be affirmed if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233248 - 2019-01-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144457 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 14, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252355 - 2020-01-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the record does not show that the circuit court made the individualized determination of unfitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132014 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 24, 2018 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207289 - 2018-01-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
were effective. With no evidence in the record to contradict this, the court finds that Marek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162380 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 30, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143483 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(Ct. App. 1998). The record demonstrates that the circuit court considered the evidence highlighted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179058 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of record, and instead relies only upon conclusory assertions. This court need not consider arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131908 - 2017-09-21