Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 4824 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu besi double Wasile Timur Kabupaten Halmahera Timur Maluku Utara.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 4824 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu besi double Wasile Timur Kabupaten Halmahera Timur Maluku Utara.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the Double Jeopardy Clause; (3) the ALJ’s “time” credit calculations were incorrect; and (4) he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084172 - 2026-03-04
the Double Jeopardy Clause; (3) the ALJ’s “time” credit calculations were incorrect; and (4) he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084172 - 2026-03-04
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled the maximum possible fines and terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13283 - 2005-03-31
Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled the maximum possible fines and terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stated that Gordee was driving evasively. Rather, Gordee contends, he was doubling back on his route
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1143409 - 2026-07-09
stated that Gordee was driving evasively. Rather, Gordee contends, he was doubling back on his route
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1143409 - 2026-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Morgan Larson
against him charged the same offense in violation of his double- jeopardy protection. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11254 - 2017-09-19
against him charged the same offense in violation of his double- jeopardy protection. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11254 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
noting that this figure would be further subject to statutory doubling. While neither party has cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
noting that this figure would be further subject to statutory doubling. While neither party has cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
CA Blank Order
the repeater allegations violated double jeopardy, as well as the Eighth and Thirteenth Amendments. He also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131833 - 2014-12-15
the repeater allegations violated double jeopardy, as well as the Eighth and Thirteenth Amendments. He also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131833 - 2014-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
further contends that it was improperly subjected to double-jeopardy by having to appear before small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
further contends that it was improperly subjected to double-jeopardy by having to appear before small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. Double jeopardy did not attach here. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675322 - 2023-07-05
of a violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. Double jeopardy did not attach here. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675322 - 2023-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
and punitive damages, double damages under § 100.18(11)(d), costs and attorney fees. Green Box, through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147173 - 2015-08-24
and punitive damages, double damages under § 100.18(11)(d), costs and attorney fees. Green Box, through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147173 - 2015-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, through counsel, asserting a double jeopardy violation after a mistrial was declared during his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
, through counsel, asserting a double jeopardy violation after a mistrial was declared during his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10