Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 10291 for ed.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 10291 for ed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
regarding exceptions to the statute[] of frauds” and that counsel “refer[ed] generally to the exceptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93769 - 2014-09-15
regarding exceptions to the statute[] of frauds” and that counsel “refer[ed] generally to the exceptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93769 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sharon Kister
.” BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 289 (6th ed. 1990). We agree with the trial court that this definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8564 - 2017-09-19
.” BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 289 (6th ed. 1990). We agree with the trial court that this definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8564 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jerry P. Dowdley
that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction because it “consist[ed] primarily of uncorroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8015 - 2005-03-31
that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction because it “consist[ed] primarily of uncorroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8015 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
an exclusion within the insurance agreement for vehicles “cover[ed] under another policy,” also known
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95271 - 2013-04-16
an exclusion within the insurance agreement for vehicles “cover[ed] under another policy,” also known
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95271 - 2013-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[counsel’s] advice,” and Aguilar personally confirmed that he “just want[ed the case] over with.” A guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06
[counsel’s] advice,” and Aguilar personally confirmed that he “just want[ed the case] over with.” A guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06
CA Blank Order
imposed in the court’s original pronouncement—this time claiming that the court “lack[ed] authority
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134534 - 2015-02-02
imposed in the court’s original pronouncement—this time claiming that the court “lack[ed] authority
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134534 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
person on top of her, that the person was Xolot, that he told her to “give [him] what [he] want[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77344 - 2014-09-15
person on top of her, that the person was Xolot, that he told her to “give [him] what [he] want[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Annette J. Mueller v. Charles R. Mueller
and that we should recognize that the trial court “penn[ed] in a handwritten footnote as an afterthought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10093 - 2017-09-19
and that we should recognize that the trial court “penn[ed] in a handwritten footnote as an afterthought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10093 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
3A Norman J. Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, § 67.2 at 104-05 (6th ed. 2001)). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141313 - 2015-05-04
3A Norman J. Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, § 67.2 at 104-05 (6th ed. 2001)). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141313 - 2015-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
on top of her, that the person was Xolot, that he told her to “give [him] what [he] want[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77344 - 2012-01-30
on top of her, that the person was Xolot, that he told her to “give [him] what [he] want[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77344 - 2012-01-30