Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 4438 for neg.

COURT OF APPEALS
he had any contraband on him, to which Rodney replied in the negative. Another officer questioned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42425 - 2009-10-19

Lisa J. Poole v. David A. Poole
court’s decision was improperly based on a negative view of the Witness faith. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5612 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dion W. Demmerly
it negatively affected his credibility. Specifically, Demmerly points to the fact that there is an apparent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11054 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
that the negative effect of the improperly worded instruction on the jury was diminished by other instructions given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36610 - 2009-05-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was that this was his first offense, he did not have any negative behavior since the offense, and he, along with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800911 - 2024-05-14

[PDF] State v. David Sautier
that the inaccurate PSI has had negative consequences for parole, security classification and programming in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11280 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
about Price’s increased risk of her victimization and re-offense due to the negative impact of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206015 - 2017-12-27

COURT OF APPEALS
and began acting as a mentor [to] at[-]risk youth in jail about the negative consequences of a life of drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08

[PDF] State v. David N. Burkhart
in this area. A grudging or negative attitude by reviewing courts toward warrants will tend to discourage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16264 - 2017-09-21

State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
arguments were not evidence, it was also advised not to draw any negative inference from Cottingham’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31