Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the prosecuting attorney was “biased” against him, based primarily on the undisputed fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90615 - 2014-09-15
argues that the prosecuting attorney was “biased” against him, based primarily on the undisputed fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90615 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is the fostering of successful prosecutions,[2] has “to a great extent, [been] rendered an anachronism” following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40653 - 2009-09-09
is the fostering of successful prosecutions,[2] has “to a great extent, [been] rendered an anachronism” following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40653 - 2009-09-09
CA Blank Order
a no-contest plea to that charge.[2] As part of the plea agreement, the prosecution agreed to recommend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103520 - 2013-10-29
a no-contest plea to that charge.[2] As part of the plea agreement, the prosecution agreed to recommend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103520 - 2013-10-29
Craig S.G. v. State
) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal; (2) a second prosecution for the same offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10552 - 2005-03-31
) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal; (2) a second prosecution for the same offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10552 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was selective prosecution; (4) whether there was a sufficient factual basis for the plea when counsel answered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94535 - 2013-03-21
was selective prosecution; (4) whether there was a sufficient factual basis for the plea when counsel answered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94535 - 2013-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS
offense. Pettis argued that the State has exclusive jurisdiction to prosecute criminal OWI second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36120 - 2009-04-08
offense. Pettis argued that the State has exclusive jurisdiction to prosecute criminal OWI second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36120 - 2009-04-08
State v. James D. Minniecheske
on the prosecution’s motion in limine; and (4) the sentence was excessive. We reject these arguments and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12044 - 2005-03-31
on the prosecution’s motion in limine; and (4) the sentence was excessive. We reject these arguments and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12044 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason R. Brown
includes three distinct constitutional guarantees: (1) protection against a second prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15155 - 2017-09-21
includes three distinct constitutional guarantees: (1) protection against a second prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15155 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert D. Zitowsky v. Dane County
in a felony prosecution. Zitowsky claimed $10,521 from Dane County, based on 150.3 hours No(s). 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13651 - 2017-09-21
in a felony prosecution. Zitowsky claimed $10,521 from Dane County, based on 150.3 hours No(s). 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13651 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, except that for purposes of investigating or prosecuting a person who is alleged to have violated any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171811 - 2017-09-21
, except that for purposes of investigating or prosecuting a person who is alleged to have violated any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171811 - 2017-09-21