Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 58285 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Laticia argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motions: (1) to preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44568 - 2009-12-14
motion. Laticia argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motions: (1) to preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44568 - 2009-12-14
COURT OF APPEALS
), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).[1] Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when it applied the forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).[1] Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when it applied the forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), 941.29(2), 940.43(7), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).1 Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96201 - 2014-09-15
), 941.29(2), 940.43(7), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).1 Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96201 - 2014-09-15
State v. Glenndale R. Black
. PER CURIAM. This is a consolidated appeal from two separate trials. In Case No. 96-0105-CR, Black
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10232 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. This is a consolidated appeal from two separate trials. In Case No. 96-0105-CR, Black
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10232 - 2005-03-31
State v. Glenndale R. Black
. PER CURIAM. This is a consolidated appeal from two separate trials. In Case No. 96-0105-CR, Black
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10071 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. This is a consolidated appeal from two separate trials. In Case No. 96-0105-CR, Black
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10071 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 ¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying Benjamin’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77359 - 2014-09-15
2 ¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying Benjamin’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77359 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77359 - 2012-01-31
for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77359 - 2012-01-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., Jr. (“V.C.”) appeals the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights to his son, J.T.C., 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192736 - 2017-09-21
., Jr. (“V.C.”) appeals the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights to his son, J.T.C., 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192736 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, who was found guilty of these crimes after a trial to the court, also appeals from an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260762 - 2020-05-19
, who was found guilty of these crimes after a trial to the court, also appeals from an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260762 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
he exercised his right of allocution at sentencing, the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217541 - 2018-08-23
he exercised his right of allocution at sentencing, the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217541 - 2018-08-23