Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 58480 for speedy trial.
Search results 1671 - 1680 of 58480 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
) and 943.20(1)(a) & (3)(d)(2), STATS. He also appeals from a trial court order denying his request for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10114 - 2017-09-19
) and 943.20(1)(a) & (3)(d)(2), STATS. He also appeals from a trial court order denying his request for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10114 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.2 Lowe argues that his trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95179 - 2014-09-15
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.2 Lowe argues that his trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
entered against him following a jury trial. Schley argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04
entered against him following a jury trial. Schley argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
entered against him following a jury trial. Schley argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04
entered against him following a jury trial. Schley argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2018AP942-CR 2 ΒΆ1 DUGAN, J. Robert Daris Spencer appeals from the order of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347588 - 2021-03-16
. No. 2018AP942-CR 2 ΒΆ1 DUGAN, J. Robert Daris Spencer appeals from the order of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347588 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
her post- disposition motion. Laticia argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44568 - 2014-09-15
her post- disposition motion. Laticia argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44568 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Laticia argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motions: (1) to preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44568 - 2009-12-14
motion. Laticia argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motions: (1) to preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44568 - 2009-12-14
COURT OF APPEALS
), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).[1] Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when it applied the forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).[1] Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when it applied the forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), 941.29(2), 940.43(7), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).1 Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96201 - 2014-09-15
), 941.29(2), 940.43(7), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).1 Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96201 - 2014-09-15
State v. Glenndale R. Black
. PER CURIAM. This is a consolidated appeal from two separate trials. In Case No. 96-0105-CR, Black
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10232 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. This is a consolidated appeal from two separate trials. In Case No. 96-0105-CR, Black
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10232 - 2005-03-31