Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16701 - 16710 of 68502 for did.
Search results 16701 - 16710 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1755-CR 2 RULE 809.21. Because the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1755-CR 2 RULE 809.21. Because the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
State v. Lou Ann Disch
that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain her. It is apparent from the circuit court’s comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5334 - 2005-03-31
that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain her. It is apparent from the circuit court’s comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Janesville & Southeastern Railway Company v. Gardner Realty Corporation
& Southeastern Railway Company (the Railway Company) did not state a claim for one of the damage theories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6133 - 2017-09-19
& Southeastern Railway Company (the Railway Company) did not state a claim for one of the damage theories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6133 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
faith.” Id. The court went on to conclude, “[T]he fact that the prosecutor … did not actually know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33147 - 2014-09-15
faith.” Id. The court went on to conclude, “[T]he fact that the prosecutor … did not actually know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33147 - 2014-09-15
T.R. Thompson Builders, Inc. v. City of Madison Zoning Board of Appeals
that the trial court erred because it did not construe and apply Madison ordinances to bar less than a fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2293 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred because it did not construe and apply Madison ordinances to bar less than a fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2293 - 2005-03-31
James Milam v. Department of Natural Resources
certification permit request, see Wis. Adm. Code § NR 299.05(5) and (6), and the DNR did not provide for final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14099 - 2005-03-31
certification permit request, see Wis. Adm. Code § NR 299.05(5) and (6), and the DNR did not provide for final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14099 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Teasdale
things, the State argues that even if the officers did unlawfully enter the curtilage, Teasdale’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16005 - 2017-09-21
things, the State argues that even if the officers did unlawfully enter the curtilage, Teasdale’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16005 - 2017-09-21
James F. Karls v. David P. Geraghty
did not attend this hearing. Karls was arrested in Costa Rica, extradited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12666 - 2005-03-31
did not attend this hearing. Karls was arrested in Costa Rica, extradited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Franken. ¶3 The group, at times, referred clients to each other, although Westerhof did not record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112739 - 2017-09-21
Franken. ¶3 The group, at times, referred clients to each other, although Westerhof did not record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112739 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reconsideration, the motion did not affect the time for appealing because it was not filed after a trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173720 - 2017-09-21
for reconsideration, the motion did not affect the time for appealing because it was not filed after a trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173720 - 2017-09-21