Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16711 - 16720 of 68445 for did.
Search results 16711 - 16720 of 68445 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence that could have conclusively demonstrated Judge did not have reasonable suspicion for the traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34358 - 2008-10-20
evidence that could have conclusively demonstrated Judge did not have reasonable suspicion for the traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34358 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michelle L. Danielson
to respond to an order to show cause. Attorney Danielson did not notify her client of either suspension
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24947 - 2017-09-21
to respond to an order to show cause. Attorney Danielson did not notify her client of either suspension
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
” towards the alley. The officer told Hnanicek to stop and, when Hnanicek did not stop, chased him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13762 - 2014-09-15
” towards the alley. The officer told Hnanicek to stop and, when Hnanicek did not stop, chased him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13762 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph S. Barfoot
transcript. The trial court rejected Barfoot’s arguments, concluding that counsel did not render deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15713 - 2017-09-21
transcript. The trial court rejected Barfoot’s arguments, concluding that counsel did not render deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15713 - 2017-09-21
WI App 123 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case...
and discussing cases). ¶5 The City argues that the complaint did not “run afoul” of the oath requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87966 - 2012-11-28
and discussing cases). ¶5 The City argues that the complaint did not “run afoul” of the oath requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87966 - 2012-11-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denied the motion. After concluding that Glass did not establish that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295882 - 2020-10-14
denied the motion. After concluding that Glass did not establish that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295882 - 2020-10-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
discretionary decisions, not for evidence to support findings the court could have but did not reach. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26831 - 2014-09-15
discretionary decisions, not for evidence to support findings the court could have but did not reach. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26831 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
approached.” • “He made his move to the right side. The officer did believe [this] to be a security
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74744 - 2014-09-15
approached.” • “He made his move to the right side. The officer did believe [this] to be a security
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74744 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael Daniels
having allegedly committed a shooting before going to the victim's home. The trial court, however, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2005-03-31
having allegedly committed a shooting before going to the victim's home. The trial court, however, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
concentration (PAC), contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Pierstorff argues that: (1) the officer who arrested her did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
concentration (PAC), contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Pierstorff argues that: (1) the officer who arrested her did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31