Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 29828 for des.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
de novo. Id. If the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, “or presents only conclusory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30666 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Id. If the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, “or presents only conclusory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30666 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
¶15 We review a denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115737 - 2014-06-30
¶15 We review a denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115737 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
is a legal issue we review de novo. Steele v. Pacesetter Motor Cars, Inc., 2003 WI App 242, ¶10, 267 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24798 - 2017-09-21
is a legal issue we review de novo. Steele v. Pacesetter Motor Cars, Inc., 2003 WI App 242, ¶10, 267 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24798 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ashanti D.
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Wodenjak
review de novo. State v. 4 Based upon Wodenjak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3401 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. 4 Based upon Wodenjak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3401 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dustin J. Johnson
the ultimate application of the law to the facts de novo. See id. ¶14 Johnson asserts his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24640 - 2006-03-27
the ultimate application of the law to the facts de novo. See id. ¶14 Johnson asserts his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24640 - 2006-03-27
[PDF]
WI APP 149
requires that we apply the pertinent statutes, and, in doing so, our analysis is de novo. See ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34086 - 2014-09-15
requires that we apply the pertinent statutes, and, in doing so, our analysis is de novo. See ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34086 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34876 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34876 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24945 - 2006-04-27
Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24945 - 2006-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, after its de novo review, finding that Officer Tuschl had reasonable suspicion to stop Schneidler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04
, after its de novo review, finding that Officer Tuschl had reasonable suspicion to stop Schneidler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04