Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 29718 for des.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 29718 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 704.17(2)(b). The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29397 - 2007-06-18
. Stat. § 704.17(2)(b). The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29397 - 2007-06-18
State v. Bobbie K.
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
exercise of discretion, we review the trial court’s application of law to undisputed facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38154 - 2014-09-15
exercise of discretion, we review the trial court’s application of law to undisputed facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38154 - 2014-09-15
State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman
. § 946.42(1)(a). We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3301 - 2005-03-31
. § 946.42(1)(a). We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3301 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Lentowski
that of resentencing the defendantde novo. We conclude, however, that a brief discussion of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11403 - 2017-09-19
that of resentencing the defendantde novo. We conclude, however, that a brief discussion of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11403 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William R. Junnor
of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard, and then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard, and then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
meet the reasonable suspicion standard is a question of law and will be reviewed de novo by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78153 - 2012-02-15
meet the reasonable suspicion standard is a question of law and will be reviewed de novo by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78153 - 2012-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127185 - 2017-09-21
was deficient and whether the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127185 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Warren A. Goodman
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10198 - 2017-09-20
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10198 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI 91
review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33407 - 2014-09-15
review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33407 - 2014-09-15