Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 29832 for des.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68293 - 2011-07-24
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68293 - 2011-07-24
State v.
performance was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31
performance was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71554 - 2011-09-28
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71554 - 2011-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo No. 2024AP957 6 and without deference to the Commission’s decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965316 - 2025-06-04
de novo No. 2024AP957 6 and without deference to the Commission’s decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965316 - 2025-06-04
Michael A. Downey v. John P. Kendall
our standard of review is de novo because the trial court made no “findings of fact but only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9436 - 2005-03-31
our standard of review is de novo because the trial court made no “findings of fact but only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9436 - 2005-03-31
Shannon S. v. Jackson C.
presents a question of statutory construction, an issue of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7035 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of statutory construction, an issue of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7035 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo, see State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122265 - 2014-09-22
of law we review de novo, see State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122265 - 2014-09-22
[PDF]
State v. Glenn Turner
establishes a prima facie case is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Moederndorfer, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7227 - 2017-09-20
establishes a prima facie case is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Moederndorfer, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7227 - 2017-09-20
State v. Aaron J. Grender
we review de novo. State v. Gammons, 2001 WI App 36, ¶6, 241 Wis. 2d 296, 625 N.W.2d 623. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7524 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. State v. Gammons, 2001 WI App 36, ¶6, 241 Wis. 2d 296, 625 N.W.2d 623. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7524 - 2005-03-31
Phillip G. Epping v. City of Neillsville Common Council
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12067 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12067 - 2005-03-31