Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 29828 for des.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 29828 for des.
Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
is a question of law we review de novo. Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400, 410, 504 N.W.2d 393 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4799 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400, 410, 504 N.W.2d 393 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4799 - 2005-03-31
University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Committee
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16146 - 2005-03-31
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16146 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
State v. Ashanti D.
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10355 - 2005-03-31
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo, State v. Lee, 2008 WI App 185, ¶7, 314 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101061 - 2017-09-21
a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo, State v. Lee, 2008 WI App 185, ¶7, 314 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101061 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Walter A. Kirch III
interpretation. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13683 - 2017-09-21
interpretation. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13683 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
present questions of law that we review de novo. See Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liab. Ins. Plan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62662 - 2011-05-25
present questions of law that we review de novo. See Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liab. Ins. Plan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62662 - 2011-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. We conclude that LeFlore has not established that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823702 - 2024-07-09
that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. We conclude that LeFlore has not established that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823702 - 2024-07-09
State v. Jay Warren Downs
, it is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Brown, 215 Wis. 2d 716, 721, 573 N.W.2d 884, 886 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14434 - 2005-03-31
, it is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Brown, 215 Wis. 2d 716, 721, 573 N.W.2d 884, 886 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kelly F. Mulder v. MSI Insurance Company
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Seep v. Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11043 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Seep v. Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11043 - 2017-09-19