Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 16721 - 16730 of 65155 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The parole commission may, for the reasons set forth in § 302.11(1g)(b)1.-2., deny presumptive mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116991 - 2014-07-17
. The parole commission may, for the reasons set forth in § 302.11(1g)(b)1.-2., deny presumptive mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116991 - 2014-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
considered information in Ellis’s juvenile file in violation of Wis. Stat. § 48.35(1)(b)1. (1995-96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28147 - 2007-02-20
considered information in Ellis’s juvenile file in violation of Wis. Stat. § 48.35(1)(b)1. (1995-96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28147 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Services. G. G. explained that she requested the restraining orders “[b]ecause they [social services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114856 - 2017-09-21
Services. G. G. explained that she requested the restraining orders “[b]ecause they [social services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114856 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gary Martin Krutke v. Jodi Ann Krutke
. First, WIS. STAT. § 767.32(1)(b) (2001-02)1 establishes a rebuttable presumption that a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7602 - 2017-09-19
. First, WIS. STAT. § 767.32(1)(b) (2001-02)1 establishes a rebuttable presumption that a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7602 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
specified in subd. 1. is a child, a parent, guardian or legal custodian of the child.” § 950.02(4)(a)-(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72859 - 2011-10-26
specified in subd. 1. is a child, a parent, guardian or legal custodian of the child.” § 950.02(4)(a)-(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72859 - 2011-10-26
State v. Peter D. Wicker
State v. Munroe, 2001 WI App 104, ¶13 n.4, 244 Wis. 2d 1, 14 n.4, 630 N.W.2d 223, 229 n.4 (“[B]oth Terry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
State v. Munroe, 2001 WI App 104, ¶13 n.4, 244 Wis. 2d 1, 14 n.4, 630 N.W.2d 223, 229 n.4 (“[B]oth Terry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
Mt. Hardscrabble, Inc. v. T.H.E. Insurance Company
or additions; or (b) Incidental to the occupancy of new buildings. (Emphasis added.) Mt. Hardscrabble
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20467 - 2005-12-05
or additions; or (b) Incidental to the occupancy of new buildings. (Emphasis added.) Mt. Hardscrabble
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20467 - 2005-12-05
Margaret J. Magnant v. Richard K. Hand
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: john b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13589 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: john b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Solorio
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARY M. KUHNMUENCH and MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARY M. KUHNMUENCH and MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 48.35(1)(b)1. (1995-96). The “new factor” was that the trial court, and all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 48.35(1)(b)1. (1995-96). The “new factor” was that the trial court, and all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15