Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16731 - 16740 of 68499 for did.
Search results 16731 - 16740 of 68499 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and that she did not intentionally throw her daughter to the ground. She further stated Dorothy banged her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30488 - 2014-09-15
and that she did not intentionally throw her daughter to the ground. She further stated Dorothy banged her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30488 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
representation. Brooks voluntarily dismissed the appeal and did not subsequently file a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77606 - 2012-02-06
representation. Brooks voluntarily dismissed the appeal and did not subsequently file a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77606 - 2012-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Thomas F. Kallenbach
a “wide radius turn” as it turned from the highway onto the street, but that it did not cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14607 - 2017-09-21
a “wide radius turn” as it turned from the highway onto the street, but that it did not cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14607 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Warren J. A.
counsel’s handling of it turn on the admissibility of the evidence. Because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12935 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s handling of it turn on the admissibility of the evidence. Because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
coworker. The prosecutor then asked L.C.: A day later did you then tell [your coworker] that you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
coworker. The prosecutor then asked L.C.: A day later did you then tell [your coworker] that you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
concentration (PAC), contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Pierstorff argues that: (1) the officer who arrested her did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
concentration (PAC), contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Pierstorff argues that: (1) the officer who arrested her did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
State v. Emmanuel Pettis
did not compel a mistrial. ¶4 Pettis argues that the fact that the area of the booking form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
did not compel a mistrial. ¶4 Pettis argues that the fact that the area of the booking form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathan Dulin
belief, this evidence did not raise an exculpatory inference as to the January 1994 incident to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11097 - 2017-09-19
belief, this evidence did not raise an exculpatory inference as to the January 1994 incident to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11097 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Brian W. Easton
and transported him for a blood test. She testified that she did not believe that the few sips of beer Easton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
and transported him for a blood test. She testified that she did not believe that the few sips of beer Easton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Anton
and was therefore not ineffective. We further conclude that the testimony of the investigating officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10427 - 2017-09-20
and was therefore not ineffective. We further conclude that the testimony of the investigating officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10427 - 2017-09-20