Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16731 - 16740 of 68274 for did.
Search results 16731 - 16740 of 68274 for did.
State v. Daniel J. Bohringer
, never came to a stop during the turn, did not leave the road, and did not drive on the grass shoulder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5832 - 2005-03-31
, never came to a stop during the turn, did not leave the road, and did not drive on the grass shoulder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5832 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with narrative form. Here, Paulson asserts counsel did not have actual knowledge he would testify falsely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89579 - 2012-11-26
with narrative form. Here, Paulson asserts counsel did not have actual knowledge he would testify falsely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89579 - 2012-11-26
State v. Michael L. Wilson
it more likely that Wilson would engage in acts of sexual violence even though Blumer did not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14966 - 2005-03-31
it more likely that Wilson would engage in acts of sexual violence even though Blumer did not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14966 - 2005-03-31
County of Clark v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
evidence supporting the Commission’s finding that his behavior did not amount to misconduct. We agree. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13631 - 2005-03-31
evidence supporting the Commission’s finding that his behavior did not amount to misconduct. We agree. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13631 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 11, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
park the car. Drummy did not call the registered owner of the vehicle to pick it up because the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26725 - 2006-10-10
park the car. Drummy did not call the registered owner of the vehicle to pick it up because the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26725 - 2006-10-10
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
. on January 8, 2001, but the circuit court did not call the case until 9:32 a.m. because Lucille
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
. on January 8, 2001, but the circuit court did not call the case until 9:32 a.m. because Lucille
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
to file a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
acknowledged to the court that he did not contest the State’s ability to prove the facts necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531996 - 2022-06-14
acknowledged to the court that he did not contest the State’s ability to prove the facts necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531996 - 2022-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
answered, “Nothing that I can come up with right now.” The court told Mitchell that he did not have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445511 - 2021-10-27
answered, “Nothing that I can come up with right now.” The court told Mitchell that he did not have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445511 - 2021-10-27
State v. Susan M. Curtis
. In the trial court, Curtis contended that the arresting officer did not have the requisite probable cause under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2939 - 2005-03-31
. In the trial court, Curtis contended that the arresting officer did not have the requisite probable cause under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2939 - 2005-03-31