Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16731 - 16740 of 68499 for did.
Search results 16731 - 16740 of 68499 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
coworker. The prosecutor then asked L.C.: A day later did you then tell [your coworker] that you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
coworker. The prosecutor then asked L.C.: A day later did you then tell [your coworker] that you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
concentration (PAC), contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Pierstorff argues that: (1) the officer who arrested her did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
concentration (PAC), contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Pierstorff argues that: (1) the officer who arrested her did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathan Dulin
belief, this evidence did not raise an exculpatory inference as to the January 1994 incident to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11097 - 2017-09-19
belief, this evidence did not raise an exculpatory inference as to the January 1994 incident to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11097 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Brian W. Easton
and transported him for a blood test. She testified that she did not believe that the few sips of beer Easton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
and transported him for a blood test. She testified that she did not believe that the few sips of beer Easton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Anton
and was therefore not ineffective. We further conclude that the testimony of the investigating officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10427 - 2017-09-20
and was therefore not ineffective. We further conclude that the testimony of the investigating officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10427 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). She contends the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78849 - 2014-09-15
, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). She contends the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78849 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
it was because he was an accomplice. The officer who interrogated Rea did not know any details of Newbury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31934 - 2008-02-25
it was because he was an accomplice. The officer who interrogated Rea did not know any details of Newbury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31934 - 2008-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Stefan testified, however, that he did not feel he had a choice when signing the form because when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
.” Stefan testified, however, that he did not feel he had a choice when signing the form because when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
. on January 8, 2001, but the circuit court did not call the case until 9:32 a.m. because Lucille
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
. on January 8, 2001, but the circuit court did not call the case until 9:32 a.m. because Lucille
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of songs “often,” and that she heard them sing “Get a New Daddy” “about three times.” The court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245613 - 2019-08-28
of songs “often,” and that she heard them sing “Get a New Daddy” “about three times.” The court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245613 - 2019-08-28