Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16731 - 16740 of 68499 for did.
Search results 16731 - 16740 of 68499 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
” towards the alley. The officer told Hnanicek to stop and, when Hnanicek did not stop, chased him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13762 - 2014-09-15
” towards the alley. The officer told Hnanicek to stop and, when Hnanicek did not stop, chased him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13762 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the initial hearing on M.R.B.’s petitions. S.S. did not appear in person or by counsel. ¶4 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197396 - 2017-10-05
the initial hearing on M.R.B.’s petitions. S.S. did not appear in person or by counsel. ¶4 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197396 - 2017-10-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
].” We conclude that the trial court did not improperly apply the domestic violence penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21
].” We conclude that the trial court did not improperly apply the domestic violence penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
4 crime, is party to that crime and may be convicted of that crime, although the person did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30830 - 2014-09-15
4 crime, is party to that crime and may be convicted of that crime, although the person did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30830 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal is whether police officers lawfully seized and frisked him. They did. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26
on appeal is whether police officers lawfully seized and frisked him. They did. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Michael Daniels
going to the victim's home. The trial court, however, did permit the victim to testify that Daniels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9988 - 2017-09-19
going to the victim's home. The trial court, however, did permit the victim to testify that Daniels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9988 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jarrett M. Adams
that such an agreement did not occur, and not that it would have been unreasonable. Accordingly, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4802 - 2017-09-20
that such an agreement did not occur, and not that it would have been unreasonable. Accordingly, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4802 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Ryan M. Tomsen v. Secura Insurance
settlement offer for $200,000 to Hayes and her insurer, Secura. Secura did not accept the offer. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6106 - 2017-09-19
settlement offer for $200,000 to Hayes and her insurer, Secura. Secura did not accept the offer. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6106 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
duty to generally share evidence with his client did not oblige him to play the tapes for Jean-Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43711 - 2009-11-24
duty to generally share evidence with his client did not oblige him to play the tapes for Jean-Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43711 - 2009-11-24
[PDF]
Larry J. Brown v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, Brown argued that the report did not list the subsection he had violated and that it had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12638 - 2017-09-21
, Brown argued that the report did not list the subsection he had violated and that it had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12638 - 2017-09-21