Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16741 - 16750 of 30097 for de.
Search results 16741 - 16750 of 30097 for de.
Frontsheet
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119971 - 2014-08-20
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119971 - 2014-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
a reasonable exercise of discretion, and even if we were to consider the question de novo, we see nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30998 - 2007-11-28
a reasonable exercise of discretion, and even if we were to consider the question de novo, we see nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30998 - 2007-11-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under the de novo standard as to issues of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208828 - 2018-03-05
court’s denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under the de novo standard as to issues of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208828 - 2018-03-05
State v. Karl D. Heppner
].” Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis.2d 23, 32, 127 N.W.2d 788, 793 (1964). Jordan was also permitted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13239 - 2005-03-31
].” Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis.2d 23, 32, 127 N.W.2d 788, 793 (1964). Jordan was also permitted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13239 - 2005-03-31
Stephen D. Artus v. Town of Three Lakes
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2996 - 2005-03-31
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2996 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald Mentzel
review de novo. See State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774, 776 (1996). The primary goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774, 776 (1996). The primary goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31
Shirley Gorchals v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
, is a question of law we review de novo. See State ex rel. Grant v. Department of Corrections, 192 Wis.2d 298
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13547 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law we review de novo. See State ex rel. Grant v. Department of Corrections, 192 Wis.2d 298
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13547 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2012-01-10
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2012-01-10
State v. Donald J. Buford
reviews de novo.” Id. (citation omitted). Moreover, a reviewing court need not address both parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo.” Id. (citation omitted). Moreover, a reviewing court need not address both parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31