Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16741 - 16750 of 29832 for des.
Search results 16741 - 16750 of 29832 for des.
State v. James E. Gray
. Construction of a statute involves a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis.2d 503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
. Construction of a statute involves a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis.2d 503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59510 - 2014-09-15
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59510 - 2014-09-15
Paula R. Becvar v. Charles F. Becvar
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
Barbara B. v. Dorian H.
and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before the trial court. At the hearing, Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6672 - 2005-03-31
and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before the trial court. At the hearing, Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6672 - 2005-03-31
Golden Rule Insurance Company v. Commissioner of Insurance
: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis.2d 274, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10101 - 2005-03-31
: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis.2d 274, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10101 - 2005-03-31
New Horizons Supply Cooperative v. George Haack
reviews de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s reasoning. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14208 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s reasoning. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14208 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6207 - 2017-09-19
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6207 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275, 278, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6399 - 2017-09-19
of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275, 278, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6399 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390669 - 2021-07-14
and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390669 - 2021-07-14