Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16741 - 16750 of 68275 for did.
Search results 16741 - 16750 of 68275 for did.
State v. Michael G. Costigan
conclude that the frisk did not constitute an arrest; that the arrest occurred later, after field sobriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the frisk did not constitute an arrest; that the arrest occurred later, after field sobriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gaspar S. Montoya
, and did only find, that a reasonable person could conclude that the allegation was untruthful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16253 - 2005-03-31
, and did only find, that a reasonable person could conclude that the allegation was untruthful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16253 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Stefan testified, however, that he did not feel he had a choice when signing the form because when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
.” Stefan testified, however, that he did not feel he had a choice when signing the form because when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Drummy did not call the registered owner of the vehicle to pick it up because the owner, Spencer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26725 - 2014-09-15
. Drummy did not call the registered owner of the vehicle to pick it up because the owner, Spencer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
does not renew on appeal his contention raised in the circuit court that the officer did not have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366652 - 2021-05-13
does not renew on appeal his contention raised in the circuit court that the officer did not have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366652 - 2021-05-13
CA Blank Order
case that the court did not comply with the procedural requirements of § 971.08 and that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122862 - 2014-09-30
case that the court did not comply with the procedural requirements of § 971.08 and that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122862 - 2014-09-30
CA Blank Order
-in charge, and that the State cannot prosecute a read-in charge in the future. Here, the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139003 - 2015-04-07
-in charge, and that the State cannot prosecute a read-in charge in the future. Here, the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139003 - 2015-04-07
[PDF]
State v. Shawn E. Avery
.” Olson testified that one of the items was an air freshener, but did not recall the size of the air
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4227 - 2017-09-19
.” Olson testified that one of the items was an air freshener, but did not recall the size of the air
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4227 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
home, right? Washington: Yes. Trial counsel: Did they ask you anything? Washington: Well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289558 - 2020-09-23
home, right? Washington: Yes. Trial counsel: Did they ask you anything? Washington: Well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289558 - 2020-09-23
[PDF]
Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
. See Barillari, 194 Wis.2d at 261, 533 N.W.2d at 764 (known danger did not exist because police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
. See Barillari, 194 Wis.2d at 261, 533 N.W.2d at 764 (known danger did not exist because police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21