Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16751 - 16760 of 46131 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Shawn A. Beasley
determines whether the charged offenses are identical in law and fact using the Blockburger test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5581 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Luther Wade Cofield
, that the records indicated Lee had tested positive for cocaine on May 12, and had possibly failed to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5877 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to an evidentiary chemical test of her blood upon request by a law enforcement officer. Fischer timely requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419102 - 2021-08-31

[PDF] State v. Walter T. Missouri
5 576 N.W.2d 30 (1998), 2 test to determine whether Scull’s “other-acts” testimony should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21670 - 2017-09-21

Rebecca E. Roethke v. James B. Roethke
. Rebecca testified that she moved into the house in Blanchardville with James in 1991 and they both worked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12144 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
percent loss of earning capacity as a result of a work-related injury. Because LIRC’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49312 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Charlie Tate, Jr. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin
to this appeal, seeking to prevent General Casualty from introducing evidence of: (1) a subsequent work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16331 - 2017-09-21

Charlie Tate, Jr. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin
) a subsequent work-related injury, which occurred in April 1998; (2) prior injuries; and (3) Tate’s cocaine use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16331 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rebecca E. Roethke v. James B. Roethke
with James in 1991 and they both worked on the house, but that after they married, they both began a “push
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12144 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James R. Thiel
for testing, but by the end of the meeting, which included the intervention of the district attorney's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16516 - 2017-09-21