Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16761 - 16770 of 69114 for he.
Search results 16761 - 16770 of 69114 for he.
State v. Kenyatta Thigpen
] He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it: (1) excluded Jermaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16038 - 2005-03-31
] He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it: (1) excluded Jermaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16038 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
where he had worked as a CI. Beyer argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863165 - 2024-10-23
where he had worked as a CI. Beyer argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863165 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The third witness, police officer O’Mollay Lomax, testified that he knew Clark for “one or two years or so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476656 - 2022-01-27
The third witness, police officer O’Mollay Lomax, testified that he knew Clark for “one or two years or so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476656 - 2022-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), first offense. He contends the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112277 - 2014-05-13
of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), first offense. He contends the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112277 - 2014-05-13
State v. Richard J. Common
Wis. Stat. § 974.06.[1] Common argues that the circuit court erred by determining that he knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2113 - 2005-03-31
Wis. Stat. § 974.06.[1] Common argues that the circuit court erred by determining that he knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
, Nos. 01-0873-CR 01-0874-CR 2 and appellate counsel. Because we conclude that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3792 - 2017-09-20
, Nos. 01-0873-CR 01-0874-CR 2 and appellate counsel. Because we conclude that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3792 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We will address each of his arguments in turn. Hahn argues that statements he made while in police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
. We will address each of his arguments in turn. Hahn argues that statements he made while in police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
where he had worked as a CI. Beyer argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863165 - 2024-10-23
where he had worked as a CI. Beyer argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863165 - 2024-10-23
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
, and battery. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Johnson claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
, and battery. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Johnson claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry B. Hooker
safety, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.02(1)(a) and 941.30(1) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6494 - 2005-03-31
safety, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.02(1)(a) and 941.30(1) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6494 - 2005-03-31