Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16761 - 16770 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 16761 - 16770 of 83395 for simple case search.
Barbara Lach v. Jennifer Hatala
. 1999). Courts will not interpret a statute in a manner that will abrogate the prevailing case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
. 1999). Courts will not interpret a statute in a manner that will abrogate the prevailing case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
in concert as they were in these cases, are not ambiguous. The plain language of the statutes clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
in concert as they were in these cases, are not ambiguous. The plain language of the statutes clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 Because some of the relevant individuals in this case share the same last name, we will refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676618 - 2023-07-06
. 1 Because some of the relevant individuals in this case share the same last name, we will refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676618 - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relief in ... a case under ch. 51, 55 or 980.” Because J.S.N. is not the “subject individual or ward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238828 - 2019-04-09
relief in ... a case under ch. 51, 55 or 980.” Because J.S.N. is not the “subject individual or ward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238828 - 2019-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND ¶3 The relevant facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248344 - 2019-10-08
for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND ¶3 The relevant facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248344 - 2019-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
was not permitted to present his case at the September hearing; and (3) he did not willfully violate the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145386 - 2015-07-28
was not permitted to present his case at the September hearing; and (3) he did not willfully violate the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145386 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Harold Merryfield
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR; 98-1107-CR; 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13905 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR; 98-1107-CR; 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13905 - 2014-09-15
State v. Harold Merryfield
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13905 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rights cases follow a “two-part statutory procedure.” Steven V. v. Kelley H., 2004 WI 47, ¶24, 271 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825006 - 2024-07-11
rights cases follow a “two-part statutory procedure.” Steven V. v. Kelley H., 2004 WI 47, ¶24, 271 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825006 - 2024-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for trial. They have been referred to by the parties as the “Consolidated Cases.” ¶7 Around the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130141 - 2017-09-21
for trial. They have been referred to by the parties as the “Consolidated Cases.” ¶7 Around the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130141 - 2017-09-21