Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16771 - 16780 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16771 - 16780 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or her plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. See id., ¶40. We consider de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354345 - 2021-04-13
or her plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. See id., ¶40. We consider de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354345 - 2021-04-13
Frontsheet
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119971 - 2014-08-20
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119971 - 2014-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this determination de novo. Id., ¶33. To meet this burden, the defendant must show No. 2024AP887-CR 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
this determination de novo. Id., ¶33. To meet this burden, the defendant must show No. 2024AP887-CR 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
City of Mequon v. Sarah J. Peacock
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5348 - 2005-03-31
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5348 - 2005-03-31
WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1202 Complete Title of...
is a question of law we review de novo. Wood v. City of Madison, 2003 WI 24, ¶12, 260 Wis. 2d 71, 659 N.W.2d 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107935 - 2014-03-25
is a question of law we review de novo. Wood v. City of Madison, 2003 WI 24, ¶12, 260 Wis. 2d 71, 659 N.W.2d 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107935 - 2014-03-25
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
. Whether a defendant's statement was voluntary is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a defendant's statement was voluntary is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10931 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10931 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Patrick Heil v. Green Bay Police and Fire Commission
raise questions of law that we review de novo without deference to the trial court. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4138 - 2017-09-20
raise questions of law that we review de novo without deference to the trial court. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4138 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Joshua D. Hansen v. Carl H. Degnitz
the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17882 - 2017-09-21
the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17882 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03