Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16771 - 16780 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16771 - 16780 of 29823 for des.
State v. Lawrence P. Peters, Jr.
that we review de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 715-16, 345 N.W.2d 457 (1984). ¶14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17536 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 715-16, 345 N.W.2d 457 (1984). ¶14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17536 - 2005-03-31
State v. Becky L. Eastman
and application of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we decide de novo. School Bd. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12798 - 2005-03-31
and application of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we decide de novo. School Bd. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12798 - 2005-03-31
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
a question of law subject to our de novo review. Id. ¶10 In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5653 - 2005-03-31
a question of law subject to our de novo review. Id. ¶10 In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5653 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Review ¶9 We review claims of constitutional error de novo, independently applying the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62842 - 2014-09-15
of Review ¶9 We review claims of constitutional error de novo, independently applying the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62842 - 2014-09-15
Rainbow Springs Golf Company, Inc. v. Town of Mukwonago
the circuit court’s action de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005 WI App 16, ¶¶2, 9, 278 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18336 - 2005-07-26
the circuit court’s action de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005 WI App 16, ¶¶2, 9, 278 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18336 - 2005-07-26
Slough Creek Properties v. Columbia County
application to an undisputed set of facts presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8839 - 2005-03-31
application to an undisputed set of facts presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8839 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven A. Conway
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8680 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8680 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 35
: Insurance contract interpretation presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo. The same rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78512 - 2014-09-15
: Insurance contract interpretation presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo. The same rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78512 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michael A. Downey v. John P. Kendall
to define the issues. In his reply brief Downey suggests our standard of review is de novo because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9436 - 2017-09-19
to define the issues. In his reply brief Downey suggests our standard of review is de novo because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9436 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in relation to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Turner v. Gene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08
in relation to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Turner v. Gene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08