Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16771 - 16780 of 29717 for des.
Search results 16771 - 16780 of 29717 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that I review de novo. Waukesha Cty. v. J.W.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255683 - 2020-03-05
the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that I review de novo. Waukesha Cty. v. J.W.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255683 - 2020-03-05
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Andrea L. Propper v. Ryan T. Propper
of a written contract presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. Whether a contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24543 - 2017-09-21
of a written contract presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. Whether a contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24543 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. We review this question de novo. Id. ¶16 Bosman contends his counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32752 - 2014-09-15
. We review this question de novo. Id. ¶16 Bosman contends his counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32752 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135181 - 2017-09-21
findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135181 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christa Brojanac
the record de novo. State v. Coogan, 154 Wis. 2d 387, 395 n.1, 453 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1990). We may only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2963 - 2005-03-31
the record de novo. State v. Coogan, 154 Wis. 2d 387, 395 n.1, 453 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1990). We may only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2963 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 704.17(2)(b). The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29397 - 2007-06-18
. Stat. § 704.17(2)(b). The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29397 - 2007-06-18
State v. Bobbie K.
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
exercise of discretion, we review the trial court’s application of law to undisputed facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38154 - 2014-09-15
exercise of discretion, we review the trial court’s application of law to undisputed facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38154 - 2014-09-15
State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman
. § 946.42(1)(a). We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3301 - 2005-03-31
. § 946.42(1)(a). We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3301 - 2005-03-31