Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16781 - 16790 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 16781 - 16790 of 83389 for simple case search.
State v. Harold Merryfield
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13907 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Merryfield
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13906 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13906 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harold Merryfield
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR; 98-1107-CR; 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13907 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1106-CR; 98-1107-CR; 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13907 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process when he was not permitted to present his case at the September hearing; and (3) he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145386 - 2017-09-21
process when he was not permitted to present his case at the September hearing; and (3) he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145386 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sussek
of the particular case, viewed at the time of counsel’s conduct.” State v. Pitch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 636, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13265 - 2017-09-21
of the particular case, viewed at the time of counsel’s conduct.” State v. Pitch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 636, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13265 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relief in ... a case under ch. 51, 55 or 980.” Because J.S.N. is not the “subject individual or ward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238828 - 2019-04-09
relief in ... a case under ch. 51, 55 or 980.” Because J.S.N. is not the “subject individual or ward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238828 - 2019-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a notice of appearance in this case on Megan’s behalf. According to CCAP entries,3 Megan appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964656 - 2025-06-03
a notice of appearance in this case on Megan’s behalf. According to CCAP entries,3 Megan appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964656 - 2025-06-03
Barbara Lach v. Jennifer Hatala
. 1999). Courts will not interpret a statute in a manner that will abrogate the prevailing case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
. 1999). Courts will not interpret a statute in a manner that will abrogate the prevailing case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
in concert as they were in these cases, are not ambiguous. The plain language of the statutes clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
in concert as they were in these cases, are not ambiguous. The plain language of the statutes clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND ¶3 The relevant facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248344 - 2019-10-08
for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND ¶3 The relevant facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248344 - 2019-10-08